Ciri Khas Pengajaran Yesus dengan Metode Perumpamaan Berdasarkan Catatan Injil Sinoptik
Abstract
The Gospel writers confirmed the parable material and arranged it in historiography. The writers have a special motive in choosing parable material to support the main theme they set in their historiography. The tendency of the interpreter is to separate the material of the parable from the unity of the material. This has the potential to cause dissonance in the teachings of the parable. Research that ignores aspects of the final form of the book makes it difficult for the interpreter to find the theological value assigned. Although there have been allegorical interpretations that have developed since the early centuries, the model is not relevant enough to be used in a comprehensive hermeneutical context. This research was conducted by observing three important aspects. First, an analysis of the author's motives. Second, analyze the initial audience. Third, analysis of the expected response of readers. Thus, the interpreter can find the theological meaning of the biblical parable of Jesus and encourage the reader to take an attitude that is by the expectations of the author of the book. The Gospel writers used parables to confirm the theological meaning of their books.
Para penulis Injil mengonfirmasi materi perumpamaan dan menyusunnya dalam sebuah historiografi. Para penulis telah memiliki motif khusus dalam memilih materi perumpamaan untuk mendukung tema utama yang mereka tetapkan dalam historigrafinya. Kecenderungan yang dilakukan oleh penafsir adalah memisahkan materi perumpamaan dari kesatuan materi. Hal ini berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpaduan ajaran dari perumpamaan. Penelitian yang mengabaikan aspek bentuk akhir kitab menyulitkan penafsir menemukan nilai teologis yang ditetapkan. Meskipun telah muncul tafsir alegoris yang berkembang sejak abad permulaan, namun model itu tidak cukup relevan digunakan dalam konteks hermeneutik yang komprehensif. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui pengamatan tiga aspek penting. Pertama, analisis motif penulis. Kedua, analisis pendengar mula-mula. Ketiga, analisis terhadap respons pembaca yang diharapkan. Dengan demikian, penafsir dapat menemukan makna teologis perumpamaan Yesus yang alkitabiah serta mendorong pembaca menentukan sikap yang sesuai dengan harapan penulis kitab. Para penulis Injil memanfaatkan perumpamaan untuk meneguhkan makna teologis dalam kitabnya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barclay, William. The Parables of Jesus. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1999.
Blomberg, Craig L. Interpreting The Parables. Second. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2012.
Bock, Darrell L., and Benjamin I. Simpson. Jesus According to Scripture: Restoring the Portrait From the Gospels. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017.
Edwards, James R. “The Gospel According to Luke.” In The Pillar New Testament Commentary, edited by D. A. Carson. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2015.
Evans, Craig A. “Parables In Early Judaism.” In The Challenge of Jesus Parables, edited by Richard Longenecker. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000.
Friberg, Barbara, Timothy Friberg, and Neva F. Miller. Analytical Lexicon of The New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000.
Gingrich, Wilbur F. Shorter Lexicon of the Greek New Testament. Edited by Frederick W Danker. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.
Hooker, Morna D. “Mark’s Parable of The Kingdom (Mark 4:1-34).” In The Challenge of Jesus Parables, edited by Richard Longenecker. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000.
Hultgren, Arland J. The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000.
Keener, Craig S. The IVP Bible Background Commentary. 2nd ed. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2014.
Kelly, J.K. The Parables of Kingdom of God. Leipzig: Dover Publications, 2018.
Lane, Williams L. The Gospel According to Mark: The English Text With Introduction, Exposition and Notes. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988.
Plummer, Robert L. “Parables in the Gospels: History of Interpretation and Hermeneutical Guidelines.” Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 13 (2009): 4–11.
Roukema, Riemer. “The Good Samaritan in Ancient Christianity.” Vigiliae Christianae 58, no. 1 (2004): 56–97.
Scott, Julius J. Jewish Background of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1995.
Snodgrass, Klyne R. “From Allegorizing to Allegorizing: A History of Interpretation of the Parables of Jesus.” In The Challenge of Jesus Parables, edited by Richard Longenecker. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000.
Stein, Robert H. “Mark.” In Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, edited by Robert W. Yarbrough and Joshua W. Jipp. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.
———. “The Genre of Parables.” In The Challenge of Jesus Parables, edited by Richard Longenecker. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000.
Talbert, Charles H. “Matthew.” In Paideia Commentaries of The New Testament, edited by Mikeal C. Parson and Charles H. Talbert. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010.
Turner, David L. “Matthew.” In Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46817/huperetes.v3i2.115
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 HUPERETES: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Diterbitkan oleh:
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Kalimantan, Jalan Gajah Mada 50 Pontianak - Kalimantan Barat. Email: office@sttkalimantan.ac.id
HUPERETES telah diindeks pada:
View HUPERETES Stats



.jpg)










